Where the persuadable voters stand on immigration
Immigration and border security ranks fourth among the issues in our latest weekly read of the U.S. Senate race between Ken Paxton and James Talarico, and its score has held steady since mid-August. That makes where voters stand on it a useful way to find the voters still in play. Of the 3.2 million Texas voters open to either candidate, 60 percent sit in the middle three bands of PharosGraph's immigration scale: leans progressive, centrist and leans conservative. Those three bands hold 37 percent of all Texas voters.
PharosGraph scores every registered voter one at a time. For each race we track, we sort voters into those firmly behind a candidate, who are worth turning out, and those still open to persuasion. A voter can be open to both candidates. Separately, we place every voter on a five-point scale on immigration and border security, from progressive to conservative. That measures where a voter stands, not how much the issue matters to them. Each band ships with a message matched to it:
These are the current messages for each band and may change.
The middle of the scale is where persuasion is still possible. Among Texas voters in the centrist band, 36 percent are in play for both candidates, close to twice the 19 percent rate for Texas voters overall.
We also track what a voter's immigration concern is mostly about. In the conservative band, voters whose concern centers on legal immigration and visas are more open than those focused on deportation and enforcement, with 14 percent in play for both candidates against 6 percent.
Monday, October 5 is the last day to register to vote in Texas, and early voting runs October 19 to 30. The two Persuade audiences for this race and the five immigration lean audiences are available now through L2 DataMapping and in LiveRamp, and they refresh monthly. For the Ken Paxton and James Talarico campaigns, the voters in the middle bands of this scale are the ones still open to either side.